Monday, August 4, 2008

John Edwards Scandal: June 2007 Eventful Month for Edwards





June 7, 2007

John Edwards Accepts "Father of the Year" Award





Mid-June 2007

John Edwards Renews His Wedding Vows by providing pictures to People magazine and Good Morning America.




May-June 2007

"...rather ironic that John Edwards was at a New York Sheraton for a luncheon on 6/7/07 to receive a "Father of the Year" award given out by "The National Father's Day Committee". I know that it has been reported that Rielle Hunter had been living at the time of this luncheon in the New York City vicinity and it is interesting that, assuming her child Frances Quinn was a full-term baby, that the date Rielle conceived would have been right around 6/7/07."
--DBKP Reader K.F.

by Mondoreb

Images: People ; brendatate


Video: Haditha Marine Dad Answers Murtha

"On national television, in front of millions of Americans, he [Rep. John Murtha, D-PA] stated ” Marines killed innocent civilians in cold blood.”
--from Wake Up America: "Letter to Murtha from Marine's Dad"



Last week, Darryl Sharratt, father of former Marine L/Cpl Justin Sharratt, responded to Congressman John Murtha regarding Murtha's comments about Justin Sharratt and the other Haditha Marines.

The video's below.




Allahpundit, of Hot Air, [Marine to sue Murtha over irresponsible Haditha accusations] hammers a complete demolition of Murtha apologists. Allah then poses a (largely) rhetorical question:

"Now, in the wake of this, will any Democrat pundits step up and criticize Murtha for rushing to judgment against US troops?"

[crickets]

by Mondoreb
image: tmq2

John Edwards Scandal: DailyKOS Bans Stranahan for Writing About Edwards

Form Reversion at DailyKOS






Same Old KOSdog, No New Progressive Tricks

How are you going to keep the KOSsacks down on the farm, once they've seen the John Edwards Love Child Scandal?

DBKP praised whack-left website, DailyKOS, on Friday [John Edwards Scandal: DailyKOS Readers Now Know; Others Remain In the Dark for writer/video producer] for letting their readers in on the John Edwards Scandal, via Lee Stranahan's four KOS diary posts.

DailyKOS readers are free to now debate the facts of the case since Stranahan started posting on the scandal. They’ve been given that right by a writer who reported on a story that the Mainstream Media not only refused to investigate, but refused to report on others who had.


Guess we spoke too soon. The progressive KOS-aratchiks pulled the plug on Stranahan's diary the day after our story came out. He is now persona non grata at the People's Republic of KOS.

In a title worthy of a '50s pulp [I've Been banned from DailyKOS because of John Edwards], Stranahan--at his own blog, Stranahan dot com--writes:

About a week ago, I posted a piece on the Huffington Post called Say It Ain’t So, John. I didn’t think it would have much more impact than my usual posts…maybe a dozen comments or so, a couple of people linking to it. I cross posted on DailyKos, which is probably the best known and biggest progressive blog. I’ve been posting at Kos for a long time. As more news about Edwards has come out, I followed up with more posts which were also the subject of a large number of comments. All of them looked at the Edwards situation from my point of view; that is, a liberal who is concerned about the implications this story may have in November.

Now I’m banned. I can’t write about ANYTHING at Kos. Can’t comment, can’t post a non-Edwards piece. Nothing.


The KOS assault on free speech, while sad is expected. But, watching the veil slowly lift from Stranahan's eyes on how proud progressives behave when confronted with unpleasant speech made us think of the finale of Old Yeller.

"I’m not sure if the DailyKos is going to take down my writing and make me a complete un-person there", wonders Stranahan.

At DailyKOS--as in another progressive paradise, the U.S.S.R.--speech is only free if you toe the party line.

Otherwise, there's a price to pay for your speech. Apparently, Stranahan's diaries were too unpleasant for DailyKOS strongman, Markos Moulitsas, whose bill for Stranahan's speech came due Saturday.

Noel Sheppard, at NewsBusters, comments [Daily Kos Bans Blogger For Writing About Edwards Scandal]:

As there are always two sides to these kinds of stories, I look forward to receiving some nasty e-mail messages from Markos Moulitsas telling me how I've completely misinterpreted Stranahan's excommunication. Stay tuned.





We're waiting too, Comrade Markos.

Sunday, August 3, 2008

John Edwards Affair: March Mystery of Edwards Non-Endorsement Not so Mysterious Now?



Your Ad Here

March Mystery of Edwards' Non-Endorsement Solved?

Love Child Scandal a Factor?

"...the Edwards' non-endorsement [of Barack Obama] is one of the mysteries of the campaign since Edwards dropped out."
--Blake Fleetwood, Huffington Post: "What is Edwards Holding Out For? on March 29, 2008




Blake Fleetwood's Foresighted Question

In March, there was some speculation on why John Edwards had not endorsed either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton for the Democrat nomination. After Obama and Edwards had spent much of the early primary season ganging up on Clinton, why hadn't Edwards come out and endorsed his one-time ally?

"...the Edwards' non-endorsement [of Barack Obama] is one of the mysteries of the campaign since Edwards dropped out."
--Blake Fleetwood, Huffington Post: "What is Edwards Holding Out For?



ALSO at DBKP:


Click on banner for over 60 DBKP stories & videos on the John Edwards scandal.



Fleetwood cites the following, from a New York magazine article by John Heilemann.

In the days after John Edwards’s withdrawal from the Democratic race, the political world expected his endorsement of Barack Obama would be forthcoming tout de suite. The neo-populist and the hopemonger had spent months tag-teaming Hillary Clinton, pillorying her as a creature of the status quo, not a champion of the kind of “big change” they both deem essential.

So appalled was Edwards at Clinton’s gaudy corporatism—her defense of the role of lobbyists, her suckling at the teats of the pharmaceutical and defense industries—that he’d essentially called her corrupt. And then, not least, there were the sentiments of his wife. “Elizabeth hasn’t always been crazy about Mrs. Clinton” is how an Edwards insider puts it; a less delicate member of HRC’s circle says, “Elizabeth hates her guts.”

But now two months have passed since Edwards dropped out—tempus fugit!—and still no endorsement. Why?
--John Heilemann, NY Magazine: Who'll stop the pain?


Heilemann goes onto quote an unnamed source who says the reason is "Obama blew it".

...According to a Democratic strategist unaligned with any campaign but with knowledge of the situation gleaned from all three camps, the answer is simple: Obama blew it.


Ironically, "unnamed sources" cited by the Enquirer was an excuse some in the MSM have used for not assigning credibility--and coverage--to the Edwards scandal. The guess here is: depends upon who's using them.

Might not this late-March "Mystery of the Edwards Non-endorsement of Obama" be better understood, in light of what is known today about Edwards, Rielle Hunter and their love child?

A few days ago, the 'teaser' for DBKP's article "John Edwards Scandal: Did Hillary Use Scandal to Force Edwards Out of the Race?" read:

Back in January, John Edwards exited the Democrat primary race--but his withdrawal was announced by Hillary Clinton. We revisit the phone call between Edwards and Clinton the night before the announcement. Does Hillary Clinton read the National Enquirer?


The article posed a few questions. Such as, "Did Hillary Clinton know what the major news organizations knew back in December, but didn’t report on: namely, that John Edwards had a problem–a “love child” problem?" And, "Did she “suggest” that Edwards get out of the race–which surprised some observers–or she would start asking some questions of her own?"

In January, DBKP's LBG had found the fact that Edwards' departure was first announced by Hillary Clinton interesting. ["Hillary Clinton Announces Edwards’ Exit, Was it the Right Price?"]:

All sappiness regarding Edwards aside, the more interesting story was tagged onto the end of Hillary Clinton’s “announcement” during an interview this morning with King5 News in Seattle.

Despite the fact that Edwards had not made a formal or informal announcement that he was dropping out of the presidential race, Hillary told the King5 News Team that Edwards had called her on the phone to tell her that he was dropping out.






LBG further wondered what deals had been discussed in the phone conversation between Clinton and Edwards in night before Hillary's--and later in the day, Edwards's--announcement.

We wondered what was behind the scenes with Hillary and Edwards little telephone talk and whether Edwards knew Hillary would be announcing his departure from the race.

We also wondered if any deals had been made, if Edwards was given any promises of future positions within the Hillary cabinet, perhaps even the V-P slot.

We were surprised to hear of Edwards’ impending departure as Edwards had said he was going to stick to his campaign all the way, even if he failed to score in next week’s Super Tuesday, that he intended to ride his campaign bus to the doors of the Democrat’s convention held in Denver in late August.


Might not that phone conversation hold a possible answer to Fleetwood's mystery? Might Edwards have promised Clinton not to endorse either candidate until the nomination was settled?

With most of the Democrat establishment lining up behind Obama, Edwards' endorsement of the junior senator from Illinois was reported on May 14, 2008--when Clinton's campaign was characterized at that point, as a "long-shot"

Democrat John Edwards endorsed former rival Barack Obama on Wednesday, a move designed to help solidify support for the party's likely presidential nominee even as Hillary Rodham Clinton refuses to give up her long-shot candidacy.
--Huffinton Post: John Edwards Endorses Obama... GOP Prospects "Worst Since Watergate"


ABC News' Political Radar described the Clinton camp's reaction to Edwards' endorsement as "upsetting".

A source close to the Clinton campaign said the Edwards camp gave the Clinton folks a head's up.

"Clearly it's upsetting" the source tells ABC. "He brings the workers" to Obama.
--ABC News: Edwards To Endorse Obama


According to a tally by the AP at the time, Barack Obama had a total of 1,887 delegates--just 139 delegates short of the 2,026 he needed for the nomination, while Hillary Clinton's delegate total was 1,718.

Edwards, trial lawyer that he is, could have convincingly argued, at that point, that the issue was settled.

Clinton suspended--but did not release her delegates--less than three weeks later on June 4.

Fleetwood asked his prescient question on March 29, 2008. In the same article, he made another statement.

"I, and many others who longed for a progressive candidate, miss his [Edwards'] brand of truth telling terribly."

In this last confession, Blake Fleetwood's prescience seems to have deserted him.

by Mondoreb
images: wikipedia

Saturday, August 2, 2008

Blog Shutdowns: Spam Attacks Came from barackobama.com IP Addresses

Explain this Away
Spam Attack came from barackobama.com

Were There More?



At least one of the attacks in the latest wave of blog shutdowns this past week came from IPs assigned to barackobama.com.

We have reported twice in the last two weeks about the attacks on anti-Obama websites. ["Google, Blogger, Obama: Obamanation Shut Down My Blog!"]] & [BabbaZee's "Anti-Obama Blogs Shut Down by Google, Obamabots"]

Speculation on who was behind the attacks has ranged from "Obama supporters" to "it's no one, just a glitch" "to it's a browser problem".

A few liberal blogs and Instapundit have said there is no connection between this latest wave of blog shutdowns and the Obama camp.

Speculation can now be set aside--at least, in one instance.

We came across this post by MacRanger at MacsMind [Macsmind Hacking UPDATE] yesterday, where Mac presents "one fact that can’t be explained away".


On July 22-25 Macsmind was DOS’d (Denial of Service) that originated from three IP addresses that are assigned to Barack Obama’s website. This isn’t a theory but was confirmed via law enforcement through an inspection of the site logs from those dates. The IP address in question; 66.39.4.254 66.39.143.229 216.146.206.181, are all registered via “Go Daddy” under the name barackobama.com.

On those dates, beginning at At 5:48PM Central on the 22nd, the hosted server that contained our site was hit by a 1.6 gigabyte flood of illegitimate traffic. The attacks never abated and only stopped when our host provider took us off line.


Spam traffic originating from three IPs assigned to the barackobama.com would seem to be compelling evidence to the disinterested reader. We haven't been able to reach MacRanger yet, but the real question isn't "Is the Obama camp involved in this?"

It's "Will this story be publicized?"

MacsMind finishes with

Speculation is one thing, but facts are another. This time however we’ve taken protective measures to prevent this from happening again. Additionally the investigation will continue and appropriate interstate authorities have been notified.


Texas Hill Country [] makes the comment, "Translation: People using computers at the Barack Obama Campaign are using them to systematically hack, attack and shut down websites that don’t agree with him. This is so messed up. It’s some Orewellian type business and it’s stuff like this that makes Obama scary as hell…"




As DBKP's Blogger site was locked down Thursday night by Blogger for being a spam site, we can attest that it was not a problem with our browser that prevented us from posting there for approximately 36 hours.

It wasn't a browser problem that caused the following message to appear when trying to post at our DBKP Blogger site.




Site Meter didn't post the two messages and lock down our blogs.

One question: "Did the spam messages that shut down DBKP@Blogger originate with the same IPs that shut down MacsMind?"

A second question: "Will Blogger and Google check?"

A final question: "If Google finds the attacks came from the IPs at barrackobama.com, will they let anyone know?"

We're not holding our breaths for answers to the last two.

by Mondoreb
image: sandia; DBKP

John Edwards Affair: Mainstream Press Still Acting as Gatekeepers

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Google, Blogger: Obamanation Shut Down My Blog!



Your Ad Here


We're able to publish again!
Blogger: "Oops! We did it again!"




Last week, we published Babba Zee's Anti-Obama Blogs Shut Down by Google, Obamabots. Thurday, Blogger locked our original (and still quite robust) site, DBKP at Blogger for being a spam blog.

One would think Blogger would have a system in place before shutting down blogs with any kind of Google Page Rank. After all, your average spam site doesn't acquire much of a page rank.

But, apparently, one would be wrong. Our original site is PR5.


In Obama's Netroots Supporters Continue "Blog Burning", Confederate Yankee isn't happy:



"Tell me once more how progressives love free speech. Online activists thought to be loyal to Barack Obama are once against using Google's software tools to target rival political blogs for elimination as spam blogs. This occurred earlier this year when Democratic bloggers with a preference for Hillary Clinton also found themselves locked out of their own blogs, all because of spurious and apparently orchestrated claims that these blogs are spam blogs. Pro-Obama activists were blamed for those attempts at censorship as well."


Blogger Buzz at Blogger had this to say:

We've noticed that a number of users have had their blogs mistakenly marked as spam, and wanted to sound off real quick to let you know that, despite it being Friday afternoon, we are working hard to sort this out. So to those folks who have received an email saying that your blog has been classified as spam and can't post right now, we offer our sincere apologies for the trouble.


Of course, it may have been, at least partially, a response to a comment I posted in the Blogger Help Forums Thursday night that began, "ARE YOU HIGH?"--or was that in one of the letters that Blogger written to Blogger

While Confederate Yankee offered an apology, we're still in no mood. Blogger's "powerful anti-spam fighting tools" apparently begin with a goofy Captcha box--many times it takes 5-6 attempts before it will allow a post to be published--and ends with shutting the blog down.

Good to know that human judgment plays such a large part in the decision-making process before Blogger will shut a blog down.

Libby, at liberal-left NewsHoggers, insists being pro- or anti-Obama had nothing to do with it.

Following up on yesterday's Blogger lockout, it appears that the problem was wide-spread and not confined to one category of blogs, so it wasn't that you were posting any particular content. However, the lockdown does remind me this morning about the importance of internet neutrality. If we lose it, this sort of thing could happen all the time and it could easily be content related.
Blogger problems update


I don't know enough yet about the category, numbers, etc. to disagree--at the moment. She also updates with, "Update: This is amusing. A lot of rightwing blogs were also affected and shockingly, immediately blamed the vast left-wing conspiracy and/or Obama supporters."

Only amusing, Libby, if you're able to write your updates and publish about how amusing it all was.

On June 30, Miguel Helft of the NY Times, wrote in the paper's Tech section about the Obama supporters shutting down anti-Obama blogs: [Google and the Anti-Obama Bloggers]

>Did Google use its network of online services to silence critics of Barack Obama? That was the question buzzing on a corner of the blogosphere over the last few days, after several anti-Obama bloggers were unable to update their sites, which are hosted on Google’s Blogger service.

The bloggers in question, most of them supporters of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, and all of them opposed to Senator Obama, received a notice from Google last week saying that their sites had been identified as potential “spam” blogs. “You will not be able to publish posts to your blog until we review your site and confirm that it is not a spam blog,” the Google e-mail read.

Many of the bloggers were affiliated with JustSayNoDeal.com, a Web site that opposes Senator Obama. They include http://bluelyon.blogspot.com, http://comealongway.blogspot.com, http://hillaryorbust.blogspot.com and http://mccaindemocrats.blogspot.com.



We agree with one angry blogger, cited in the Times' story, GeekLove:

“Without any notice, apology, or explanation, my posting privileges has been reinstated,” wrote the author of the blog Come a Long Way, who identifies herself as GeekLove. “Blogger’s ‘guilty until proven innocent’ approach is appalling. As bloggers, it is a good thing we still have choices, and I have exercised my choice to leave Blogger and establish a new home at WordPress.”

"Without any notice, apology, or explanation" covers our experience as well.

Bloggasm relates anti-Obama bloggers (again, former Hillary supporters) have also been the target of more than just having their Blogger blogs shut down. [Who’s responsible for shutting down a number of anti-Obama Blogspot accounts?]

When it comes to butting heads with Obama supporters, perhaps nobody has more experience than Larry Johnson. If his name rings a bell, it’s because Johnson, who worked for the CIA in the ’80s and now does military consulting, was the origin of the famous “whitey” claim. Not long ago he reported on his website that people connected with the McCain campaign are in possession of video footage of Michelle Obama saying derogatory things about white people. However, he admitted that he hadn’t actually seen the video and his two sources hadn’t seen it either. He quickly became a target of bloggers from both the right and left.


“The problem with these people who had their Google accounts shut down, they’re intimidated by it,” Johnson said. “They don’t want to get themselves in a situation so they would be identified. Some of these people who get identified, the Obama folks start picking up the phone and calling. I had phone calls into my office, threatening me, saying that you’re going to be fired, let me talk to your boss. I told them to go fuck themselves, because I am my own boss. It helps to be self-employed.”

If readers are interested in reading more, Google (with an ironic, bitter smile, perhaps?) "obama shut down blogs", and any the articles on the first three-four pages should bring them up to speed.

Did Obama supporters shut us down?

Can't say with certainty at this point. We can say that it all may have been a coincidence this time. But, the previous spate of blog closings weren't.

In light of their previous actions, we'll take a page from Blogger's flawed spam policy: Obamanation is guilty until proved innocent.

by Mondoreb
image: RidesAPaleHorse
 
coompax-digital magazine