Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Alan Mollohan: Congressman One of 15 Most Corrupt



Your Ad Here



"Recall that Alan Mollohan (D-WV) is a former chair of the House Ethics Committee. That's the same Mollohan under federal investigation after the National Legal and Policy Center filed a complaint with the department regarding a bizarre increase in Mollohan's net worth. For 2005, Mollohan and his wife reported assets worth $6.8 million to $25.7 million, up from $116,000 to $315,000 in 1999. His financial disclosure restatements came only after the group's complaint."
--Doug Ross, Draining the Swamp




NOTE: If at any time, the reader is a resident of West Virginia's 1st Congressional District and feels moved to contact Alan Mollohan's office for the Congressman's take on the information presented in this article, contact information is provided throughout this piece.

MOLLOHAN'S OFFICE
PHONE: 202-225-4172
FAX: 202-225-7564



EARMARKS For FRIENDS, FORMER AIDE in THOSE WV HILLS



[ABOVE: Alan Mollohan, former chairman of the House Ethics Committee, forced to step down in 2006 over questions about his ethics.]

Congressman Named Among Most Corrupt


Rep. Alan Mollohan (D-WV), dubbed "the overnight millionaire," is in the news again. He received his nickname because in 2000 Mollohan had no portfolio to speak of while making less than $80K a year. By 2004, he reported having at least $6.3 million in assets that generated income of somewhere around $700K annually. Earlier this week, it was reported that a non-profit funded by Mollohan (with the taxpayers' money, of course) had provided his family with $75,000 in free rent and services.
--Above the Law: A Handy Guide to Democrat Corruption



MOLLOHAN'S OFFICE
PHONE: 202-225-4172
FAX: 202-225-7564





WHO DOES ALAN MOLLOHAN REPRESENT?




West Virginia's 1st Congressional District


Congressman Alan Mollohan has certainly made a name for himself. Some might even say that Mollohan is famous. Others might use the term "infamous".

Google the terms "Alan Mollohan" and "corruption" and the search engine returns 8600+ results.

So, who would keep sending such a representative to Washington, DC to look after their interests? The people of northern West Virginia, that's who.

Congressman Alan Mollohan represents the 1st Congressional District in West Virginia. The district is comprised of 20 counties in West Virginia's northern section. A lot of Mollohan's constituents come from blue-collar, socially-conservative, working class backgrounds.

The area's voters are mostly registered Democrats, but the 1st Congressional District went for John McCain in 2008. In fact, no Democrat since Bill Clinton has carried the 1st District in a presidential election.

So, the voters of the 1st District don't mindlessly pull the lever for all Democrats.


"...West Virginia Democratic Congressman Alan Mollohan, who spent the better part of the decade earmarking himself from rags to riches."
--What About the Democrats’ 'Culture of Corruption?'

Where did it all start to go wrong for Alan Mollohan?

It all started in 2006, when the "National Legal and Policy Center filed a 500-page ethics complaint against Mollohan, alleging that the congressman misrepresented his assets on financial disclosure forms."

That caused the congressman to file amendments to past financial disclosure forms and to explain his now-claimed personal wealth.

Mollohan has defended his meteor-like rise in wealth to his wife's hard work over the last 10 years and her astute real estate savvy.

“For more than a decade, my wife Barbara has marketed and managed our real estate investments. That is her full-time job; it’s been her career for 10 years. She has worked hard at it and she has been successful,” Mollohan said. “Rather than simply recognizing the long hours Barbara has put into her career, NLPC has made sinister allegations about our investments."

“The group also has ignored that we received a sizable inheritance, took on considerable financial risks, and had the good fortune to be investing in a rising real estate market. It is those factors that are responsible for the increase of our assets."


But tough time in real estate market can hit even the savvy: Mollohan Scandal Property Goes to Foreclosure.

More on this particular point later.


FROM Wikipedia:
When his father, Bob, retired in 1982 after 16 years in Congress spread out over two stints, he endorsed his son as his successor. Alan was elected that November in a very competitive contest. He faced another close race in 1984, but was unopposed for a third term in 1986. He has not faced serious opposition in a general election since, running unopposed in 1992, 1996, 2002 and 2008. In 1998 and 2000, no Republican candidate ran against Mollohan. In both of those years he was opposed by a Libertarian Richard Kerr, but Mollohan won handily.


In 2010, WV State Sen. Clark Barnes will challenge Mollohan for his 1st Congressional seat.

Barnes has connections throughout West Virginia's 1st Congressional District that could prove beneficial to him. Mollohan, D-W.Va., is currently serving his 14th term in Congress.

Barnes' residence in Beverly, W.Va., is located within West Virginia's 2nd District represented by U.S. Rep. Shelly Moore Capito, R-W.Va.

The rules for running for Congress are established by the U.S. Constitution, and require only that a candidate live within the state he or she would represent.
--Clark Barnes Will Seek Seat in 2010


As can be guessed from a long-term Congressman who has done so well for himself, Mollohan should have quite a war chest, come campaign time.

According to Open Secrets, Mollohan has a net worth that went "From $-2,381,981 to $21,345,993 and Ranks 33rd among all members of the House".

His campaign finance disclosures show that he only has $30,118 cash on hand as of September 30, 2009. However, Mollohan's financial disclosures have had to be amended many times over the last several years due to "inadvertent errors" on Mollohan's part.

The last time Mollohan had Republican opposition, he raised over $1.6 million for the 2006 race.







ALAN MOLLOHAN: Defender of ACORN


In mid-September 2009, the (Association of Community Organizers for Reform Now) ACORN scandal broke across America. The IRS and Census Bureau cut ties to ACORN and its affiliates. The House of Representatives moved quickly to cut off funding. Only 75 Representatives voted to continue funding ACORN, already under investigation in 10 states for voter fraud.

Alan Mollohan was one of those 75.


The House of Representatives just voted overwhelmingly to de-fund ACORN, 345-75. The vote came on a Republican motion to recommit the educational loan bill. As a result, the anti-ACORN provision made it into the House-passed bill.

Below are the names of all 75 congressmen who voted to preserve ACORN's stream of funding. The biggest surprises on the list: Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., and the two Democrats from West Virginia, Alan Mollohan and Nick Rahall.

--House votes to cut off funding, but 75 stand by ACORN


For several days, Mollohan was unavailable for comment on his vote. He finally attempted a defense of his vote at an event in Weirton, WV.


Mollohan acknowledged there have been "accusations of irregularities" pertaining to new voter registration accrued by ACORN. And in a video coming to light this week, two ACORN employees are seen apparently advising a couple posing as a prostitute and her pimp to lie about her profession and launder her earnings.

"There has been one outrageous accusation - that an ACORN-managed facility indicated willingness to rent an apartment when obviously nefarious conduct was intended," Mollohan said.

"No one is accusing every ACORN organization of misconduct, and (Republicans) are painting with a broad brush. They are indicting a whole organization based on the conduct of a few. It seems fundamentally wrong to do that."
--Mollohan Defends ACORN Vote


IN his defense of his ACORN vote, Mollohan implied that the the ACORN videos were 'made-up'.


"A reporter with the New York Times made up stories and won awards for them," he (Mollohan) commented. "And they were not real. They were factually made up. But that doesn't indict the New York Times or all printed press. The printed press shouldn't be indicted because of the conduct of a few. . . ."


In case the reader is one of the few who haven't seen the string of videos made at ACORN offices across America (where the two actors who portrayed a pimp and a prostitute received help on how to set up a child sex slave prostitution business), the first video is below.




DBKP called Mollohan's office to see if the congressman's take on ACORN had changed since he addressed the woman's club outing in Weirton last month.

Our phone call was not returned.




This is what Alan Mollohan voted to continue funding with US taxpayers' dollars.

This is one of the videos that Mollohan tries to explain away by implying they were "factually made up".

In Mollohan's defense, only the first couple of ACORN sting videos were released at the time he voted to continue funneling US tax dollars to the organization.

Is this good judgment? The reader will have to decide that question.

Why not call Congressman Mollohan's office and ask?

MOLLOHAN'S OFFICE
PHONE: 202-225-4172
FAX: 202-225-7564







ALAN MOLLOHAN MAKES NATIONAL NEWS





A federal jury convicted former Congressman William Jefferson, D-New Orleans, of 11 counts of being one big crook...Let his conviction strike fear in the hearts of Democrats Jack Murtha, Alan Mollohan, Peter Visclosky and the rest of the Earmarks Inc. Let it strike fear in the hearts of Republicans.
--Democrat William Jefferson — convicted


Don Surber is a reporter for the Charleston Daily Mail. He's often quoted around the country. Is his inclusion of Mollohan in the list with the other members of Earmarks Inc accurate?

Why not contact the Congressman and ask?

MOLLOHAN'S OFFICE
PHONE: 202-225-4172
FAX: 202-225-7564





Pelosi  drains the swamp
[ABOVE: Who did Nancy Pelosi find after draining the Congressional swamp?



"Recall that Alan Mollohan (D-WV) is a former chair of the House Ethics Committee. That's the same Mollohan under federal investigation after the National Legal and Policy Center filed a complaint with the department regarding a bizarre increase in Mollohan's net worth. For 2005, Mollohan and his wife reported assets worth $6.8 million to $25.7 million, up from $116,000 to $315,000 in 1999. His financial disclosure restatements came only after the group's complaint."
--Doug Ross, Draining the Swamp

Mollohan has said such reports as the one above are made by "national political operatives who are desperate to unseat me because I refused to let the House Republican leadership gut the House ethics process last year.” [Wikipedia]

The Republican leadership didn't "gut the House ethics process", but apparently Democrat Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, did. Mollohan was forced to step down from his ethics committee chair after more "desperate reports".




Pelosi now faces the challenge of whether to let West Virginia Democratic Congressman Alan Mollohan [that's his modest beach house ... can you say Duke Cunningham?] head the Appropriations subcommittee, which oversees the FBI, an organization which plans to spend part of the money Mollohan lets them have investigating Mollohan! Formerly the ranking Democrat on the House ethics committee — until his scandals forced him to step down — Mollohan has increased his assets from less than $500,000 in 2000 to more than $6.3 million in 2004. His investments, which generated less than $80,000 in 2000, reaped between $200,000 and $1.2 million in 2004.

How did he do it? He got federal funding earmarked for certain companies that his friends either owned or worked for, then got his buddies to pick up half the tab for joint real estate investments with him and his family. For example, he got FMW Composite Systems $4.4 million in earmarks and then teamed up with its CEO to buy a $900,000 farm, which the Mollohans and FMW’s chief split 50-50. The congressman told The New York Times that the thought that the deal might represent a conflict of interest “did not occur to me” when he — literally — bought the farm.
--Another Dem Scandal



Did Speaker Pelosi "gut the House ethics process" by forcing Mollohan from his House Ethics Committee chair?

Readers are invited to call the Congressman's office and find out for themselves.

MOLLOHAN'S OFFICE
PHONE: 202-225-4172
FAX: 202-225-7564






The Alan Mollohan Way

How did Alan Mollohan acquire the millions now listed on his financial disclosure forms? Mollohan said it was his inheritance and his wife's business savvy.

Others point to "The Mollohan Way".


Starting in the 1990s, Rep. Alan B. Mollohan (D-W.Va.) chose an unusual way to funnel federal funds into his poverty-ridden district. He set up a network of nonprofit organizations to administer the millions of dollars he directed to such public endeavors as high-tech research and historic preservation.

Over the same period, Mollohan's personal fortunes soared. From 2000 to 2004, his assets grew from no more than $565,000 to at least $6.3 million. The partners in his rapidly expanding real estate empire included the head of one of these nonprofit groups and the owner of a local company for which he arranged substantial federal aid.

Mollohan used his seat on the House Appropriations Committee to secure more than $150 million for five nonprofit groups. One of the groups is headed by a former aide with whom Mollohan bought $2 million worth of property on Bald Head Island, N.C.
--West Virginia Democrat is Scrutinized




As stated earlier, Mollohan now reports his personal net worth as being in excess of $21 million.



Questions in Washington have been raised about why millions of dollars of federal money have been steered toward non-profit groups supportive of U.S. Rep. Alan Mollohan. But voters in the 12-term Democrat's West Virginia district don't seem to care too much.
--TIME: Campaign '06: Pork Trumps Scandal in West Virginia


But at least one of Mollohan's real estate deals have not turned out to his liking.

A North Carolina county court has begun a foreclosure on coastal property owned by Rep. Alan Mollohan (D-W.Va.) due to “default in the payment of the indebtedness” on the property.

Mollohan had been criticized for purchasing several lots on Bald Head Island, a North Carolina beach resort, with Laura Kuhns, a former Mollohan staffer who now runs a West Virginia nonprofit that has received millions of dollars in earmarks from the Congressman.

On his most recent financial disclosure form, Mollohan listed his 50 percent share of the Bald Head Island lot as being worth $250,000 to $500,000, with a mortgage worth $100,000 to $250,000. Mollohan reports a minimum net worth of about $4.1 million.
--Mollohan Property Faces Foreclosure


How did Alan Mollohan come to own the beachfront property?


The lot was one of five properties co-owned by the Mollohans and Kuhnses that have been part of a controversy that prompted an on-going Justice Department investigation, and Mollohan’s resignation as Ranking Member on the House Ethics Committee in 2006.

Kuhns is President and CEO of Vandalia Heritage Foundation, one of five nonprofits to which Mollohan has earmarked well over $100 million. The cozy relationships between Mollohan and his earmark recipients, against the backdrop of a rapid increase in Mollohan’s net worth, created the appearance that Mollohan is benefitting personally from the earmarks.
--Mollohan Scandal Property Goes to Foreclosure


Does everything look as it should involving these transactions?

Why not call the Congressman's office and see what he thinks?

MOLLOHAN'S OFFICE
PHONE: 202-225-4172
FAX: 202-225-7564




Alan Mollohan's earmark money questions

How goes it today with Rep. Mollohan?

FROM The 15 Most Corrupt:
First-timers on the 2009 list are Senators Roland Burris and John Ensign, as well as Congressmen Nathan Deal, Jesse Jackson, Jr. and Pete Visclosky. Twelve of the 15 are under investigation of some kind: Vern Buchanan, Burris, Ken Calvert, Ensign, Jackson, Jerry Lewis, Alan Mollohan, John Murtha, Charlie Rangel, Laura Richardson, Visclosky and Don Young. Calvert, Lewis, Mollohan and Murtha made the CREW list for the fourth year in a row.

--15 Most Corrupt Members of Congress


In case readers may think that the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (who publishes the Most Corrupt list) is a "right wing attack group", seven of the 15 Most Corrupt are Republicans; eight are Democrats.

If Alan Mollohan has so many questionable associations and money ties, why hasn't he been indicted or charged?

But Ken Boehm, chairman of the NLPC, told the Sunday News-Register that he isn't concerned there have been no announcements from either agency pertaining to Mollohan.

He noted that the federal case against former Democratic Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich took more than five years before charges were announced. The case was expedited when Blagojevich, who was to appoint the successor to President Obama's former Senate seat, allegedly was found to be offering the seat for financial profit to himself.
--Mollohan Under Fire


Oh.




But Congressman Mollohan remains philosophical about the charges.

"I would have done things differently," he said as he drove through West Virginia's northern panhandle. "It puts you in a position where people could say there's something untoward going on."
--Alan Mollohan, from West Virginia Democrat is Scrutinized

As mentioned above, Mollohan was named one "The 15 most corrupt members of Congress" by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).

Over the past ten plus years, Rep. Mollohan has earmarked $369 million in federal grants to his district for 254 separate programs. Between 1997 and 2006, $250 million of that total was directed to five nonprofit organizations that were created by Rep. Mollohan and staffed by his friends. During the same period, top-paid employees, board members and contractors of these organizations gave at least $397,122 to Rep. Mollohan’s campaign and political action committees.
CREW Report on Alan Mollohan--





ALAN MOLLOHAN: VICTIM?



Is Alan Mollohan, whose personal wealth has skyrocketed over the last several years, a victim?

That's how the Congressman has tried to portray his mounting legal defense fees: it was not his own actions which brought about his legal troubles, it was the "claims of a right-wing group" that there "were irregularities".



Through a spokesman, Rep. Mollohan gave us the following statement: "The legal expenses were incurred in responding to the claims of a right-wing group in Washington that there were irregularities in my financial disclosure documents. That resulted in the preparation and public release of an extensive financial disclosure report and analysis last June. That work debunked the claims and the accompanying innuendos."
--Under FBI Scrutiny, Mollohan Runs up $160K Legal Bill



Debunked?

Today, Alan Mollohan remains "under investigation".




"Democratic Congressman Alan Mollohan and Nick Joe Rahall of West Virginia are both in favor of Obamacare."
--Obamacare lacks the votes

Is the reader a resident of Mollohan's 1st Congressional District? If the answer is "yes" and is in favor of ObamaCare, then let the Congressman know.

If the reader is a resident and the answer is "no", then perhaps the Congressman would like to know about that too.

MOLLOHAN'S OFFICE
PHONE: 202-225-4172
FAX: 202-225-7564



Here it is: almost at the end of 2009. For the last four years, Alan Mollohan has been named one of the Most Corrupt politicians in Washington. His net worth has skyrocketed during the last decade: some would say by corrupt practices; Mollohan would assert that it's because he married a girl with a knack for real estate.

As was mentioned, most of the residents of West Virginia's 1st Congressional District are working class people: some with families, all with the daily challenges of life pressing upon them. It's likely that most don't know everything that their Congressman has been up to in Washington.

This article would hope to help them out by providing some information that's freely available. Perhaps this article will pique the curiosity of some of those voters into doing a bit of research for themselves about their representative, Alan Bowlby Mollohan.

In a little over a year, the Congressman will face a contested election: one of the few he's had in his thus far fortunate political career.

The people who vote in Mollohan's district will have to decide what's more important to them in that 2010 contest.

A congressman they've grown accustomed to or a newcomer whose wife probably doesn't know nearly as much about investing in real estate as Mrs. Mollohan.

Was TIME magazine correct in their 2006 assessment referred to earlier?

In West Virginia's 1st Congressional District, does 'pork trump scandal'?


by Mondo Frazier

images:
* swamp: Doug Ross
* pimp: http://www.babble.com
* WV1: en.wikipedia.org
* most corrupt, under investigation: http://www.crewsmostcorrupt.org







Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Poll: Palin Hands out Best Halloween Candy



Your Ad Here


Palin with McCain in Washington, PA
[Sarah Palin with John McCain in Washington PA 08-27-08]




A GOOD SIGN?


After reading an article on the Weekly Standard's Matthew Continetti and his coming book on the media's attacks on Sarah Palin [The Persecution of Sarah Palin.Palin Book: Feminists Jealous of Sarah's Rise], a poll was noticed on U.S. News & World Report's sidebar.

Bobbles Poll: Halloween Candy

Who do you think is more likely to hand out the best Halloween candy?

Below are the results at the time [1830 10-27-09]:

Read rest of story: Sarah Palin and the Best Halloween Candy: USNWR Poll.

by Mondo Frazier

images: DBKP file; USNWR







Monday, October 26, 2009

RINOs Attack Glenn Beck: Magic -R- No Cure for What Ails U.S.



Your Ad Here


Grab some Squish!


ALLAHPUNDIT CAN'T ABIDE BECK's STAND; MAKES THE CASE FOR RINO-WORSHIP:

Video: Glenn Beck goes all in for Doug Hoffman — and third parties




MENTAL SHORTHAND as a SUBSTITUTE for ACTUAL ANALYSIS


Hot Air's AllahPundit recycles a tired argument about conservatives sitting down and shutting up when the RNC sticks the goobers in the sticks with a liberal weenie candidate.

It's all about being on the winning team, doncha know? A variation of "My tired Republican hack can beat up your tired Democrat hack!"

We agree with AllahP. more than we disagree. But that doesn't mean that it's not getting tiresome for conservatives/libertartians to be endlessly lectured about supporting--well, somebody, anybody, long as that magic "R" is tagged alongside the name.

Apparently, AP listened to some Glenn Beck and now sees disaster if conservatives decide they're tired of generic politicians and elect to stand on principle.

It's all mental shorthand for avoiding what used to called 'fighting the good fight'.

One crushing defeat away from total victory, in perpetuity. A question for Beck fans, borrowing a line uttered here by the man himself: What is the endgame? There’s a sense I get from watching Beck that he thinks there’s a supermajority out there willing to return to Founders-style libertarianism if only he and other conservatives hammer the message hard and long enough. I don’t think there is. And if I’m right that there’ll always be at least 40 votes or so in the Senate and 45 percent among the population for progressivism, how does he presume to enact the libertarian agenda while confronting the realities of congressional compromise?


Ahhh. The "endgame". What does the endgame for people like the good Allah turn out to be?

It's the rosy scenario of Bob Doles, G.H.W Bushes and John McCains stretching far into the future as far as can be imagined--at least until the rubes wise up and opt out of the system because no one represents their concerns anymore.

It's the idea that Republican Party apparatchiks are so electorally smarter than the great unwashed they're supposed to be serving.

When Republicans are lectured about a "winning formula" by the New York Times' editorial board: that's annoying.

When famed squish-meisters like Kathleen Parker and Christopher Buckley--both of whom conservatives are wise to--throw in their hectoring two cents worth: that's both annoying and useless.

But when the lecture is followed by eight years of Bill Clinton and the Obama Good Time Hour and is delivered by the occasional well-meaning right-leaning pundit: well, that's nearly unbearable.

At some point, "well-meaning" can be understood to mean "well-meaning tool". There's no debating these types: a philosophical difference of opinion spells doom for the Republican Party.

But make no mistake: this debate must be held and now's as good a time as any. It's past time for conservatives/libertarians to stop apologizing for standing on principle.

Exactly when is the right time for conservatives to open a can of New! Improved! STFU?

Following this well-meaning advice will produce much the same situation as in Europe and the UK. There, the rise of nationalist parties has been a response to the major parties turning a deaf ear to the concerns of the workaday saps that didn't attend the right schools.

These parties usually contain extreme elements--but keep getting stronger because Europe's political elites govern as they damn well please and the yokels who work for a living can shut the hell up and vote as they're told. The elites know better because they're elite and stuff.

Script sound familiar?

After the nationalist parties start picking off seats in national legislatures, those same pundits--who told the hicks to shut up, vote the PC Party Line and everything will turn out swell--then amuse themselves by tarring the frustrated masses for consorting with the "racists" and "Nazis" that these parties inevitably seem to attract on the fringes.

The masses then amuse themselves by completely ignoring the pompous asses to whom they once listened--and trusted.

----


IF NOT NOW, WHEN?


Only today, Gallup states that 20% view themselves as Progressives, but Allah sees that number ballooning somehow to "45%".

All because conservatives are tired of being played for suckers.

Of course, a "permanent (progressive) 45% of the population"--if that were possible in the near future--does help make this oft-repeated-though-still-false argument. The number of self-identified liberal/progressives has been stuck at 20% for awhile now; so somehow, conservatives should shut their mouths--the better to eat their RNC-sponsored shit sandwiches they keep getting fed--and this will stop the evil Democrats from winning?

Thank God conservatives didn't listen to that kind of advice in the 1970s. Had they followed that logic, Ronald Reagan would have been known largely as a B-movie actor.

Thank God those that couldn't abide slavery didn't listen to this kind of pablum in the 1850s. Else there would have been no Republican Party to spawn the squishy candidates beloved of RINOs today.

JUST ONCE it would refreshing to hear these principle-evading apologists explain why voting for a cap-and-trade, amnesty-loving, abortion-sponsoring stimulus-cheering Republican is so much better than voting for the Democrat counterpart--other than style points and the odd parliamentarian maneuver?

It is exactly this "well-meaning" advice that was argued in support of political finger-in-the-wind testers like Arlen Specter and Lincoln Chafee. How are those decisions working out for the Republican party today, huh RNC?

MEMO to Hand-wringing, RNC-loving robo-dopes: just as being a RINO/moderate doesn't mean you'll mindlessly pull the lever for every John McCain clone that makes the ballot--evidence this RINO-in-the-room: Obama won the moderates that supposedly was McCain's strength in 2008--so might conservatives have enough sense to pick their spots about when and who to support.

But then, acknowledging that point would mean conceding important parts of Glenn Beck's argument.

Also, that would mean the unthinkable: that harried pundits working against deadlines would have to stop using mental shorthand when compiling pieces and resort to actually doing some thoughtful analysis.

Support for a conservative third-party candidate doesn't mean support for every conservative third-party candidate.

Perhaps, the RNC might be moved to run candidates which actually stand for something--besides a chance to deliver the occasional winner in a Democrat-wannabe empty suit.

Perhaps the Republican Party will have actual conservatives running and voters will get a real choice.

Novel thought, that.

Heavens knows that the opposite occurs all too often nowadays. But you don't see the hand-wringers getting their panties in a bunch when a liberal Republican jellyfish squares off against a liberal Democrat.

In their mental shorthand: that's letting democracy work for the betterment of unenlightened hicks, boobs and redneck Jonnys everywhere across the fruited plain.

UPDATE:



Saw this after posting at Michelle Malkin: Cartoon of the Day which came to her from TobyToons via RedState.

It fits this article to a "T".



by Mondo Frazier

image: http://www.ratemyscreensaver.com






Culture Watch: No US Jobs, No US Money, Idiots of the Week



Your Ad Here




[ABOVE: Americans starting to wise up]


Culture Watch Vol. 89
Nancy Morgan
RightBias.com
October 26, 2009


Conservatives who get their news from RightBias.com are already aware of the massive assaults on the Constitution that took place last week - and most are also aware of the fact that it has now been 57 days since General McChrystal told Obama that more troops are desperately needed in Afghanistan.

And the fact that Obama has chosen to wage war on Fox News and the Chamber of Commerce instead of sending reinforcements to our brave warriors who are fighting and dying in Afghanistan.

That said, I've decided most of us need some uplifting news, so this week's issue of Culture Watch will focus on all the:

GOOD NEWS:


For the first time in recent years, voters trust Republicans more than Democrats on all 10 key electoral issues regularly tracked by Rasmussen Reports. Sometimes voters are as slow as Obama to recognize reality.

Speaking of Obama, (again and again....) he has suffered the worst 3rd quarter drop in approval ratings since 1953. The 9% point decline is twice the amount of any other post-war elected president. Just so.


Tennessee is joining the growing number of states that are standing up to the federal government, urging states to come together and create a "joint working group between the states" to combat unconstitutional federal legislation and assert state rights. For our liberal readers, we refer you to the 10th Amendment. For Tennesseeans, we say "Way to go!"

Speaking of standing up, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio says he has no intention of bowing to demands from the Obama administration that he stop arresting illegal aliens.
(It seems the only agency to lose its authority under the 287(g) program to operate task forces that can enforce federal immigration laws is Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office.)

Bad news for Father Earth, algore: There has been a sharp decline over the past year in the percentage of Americans who say there is solid evidence that global temperatures are rising. And fewer also see global warming as a very serious problem.

Alas, the New York Times is being forced to cut the size of its news staff by 8 percent by the end of the year. Despite losing money and prestige, the NYT still refuses to acknowledge that a good 50% of Americans prefer hard news over liberal ideology.

Last, but not least: For the first time in 35 years, all branches of the military met their recruiting goals for 2009.


CULTURE:



New ads are adorning subway stations in New York: they ask the question, written simply over an image of a blue sky with wispy white clouds: "A million New Yorkers are good without God. Are you?"

Andy Schlafly, founder of Conservapedia.com, wants to save the Scriptures from liberals with his latest venture, the Conservative Bible Project. Check it out.

We're sad to inform you that Rosie O'Donnell and her 'wife' appear to be headed for 'divorce.'

History was made without fanfare on last weekend as William and Mary University crowned their first transgendered homecoming queen.

A Denver alternative newspaper recently posted an ad for what some consider the sweetest job in journalism - a reviewer of the state's marijuana dispensaries and their products.

A Danish movie about a gay love affair between two members of a neo-Nazi group won top honors Friday at the Rome Film Festival. Talk about a film that just tugs on my
heartstrings...



OF INTEREST:



Politically Correct White Flight: A fascinating analysis of a curious aspect shared by progressive urban havens like Austin, Portland and suchlike: they have relatively few black people in them.

Its now official: The U.S. government is bankrupt.

7 months after the 'stimulus,' 49 of 50 states have lost jobs. Hey, that's only 6 million shy of Obama's promise.

Obama has another TelePrompTer moment and a former Fox News contributor said she had to quit, cause Glenn Beck is just so "scary." By golly, I think I just saw a pig fly right by my window!


TOP IDIOTS OF THE WEEK AWARDS:



So many idiots, so little space. This week's top award goes to the UN. They want 'gender equity' in the war on terror. (Can I say that?) Chris Matthews ties with Gore Vidal for Most Idiotic Statement and we have a huge new number of eco-idiots deserving of recognition. Check out all these idiots here.

If these awards don't make you smile, you must be having a really bad hair day:)


Till next week, take heart. Americans are finally wising up.

Nancy Morgan
RightBias.com







25 Most Memorable Movie Quotes of All Time



Your Ad Here



Sunset Boulevard

25 Most Memorable Movie Quotes




WHAT ARE THE 25 MOST MEMORABLE MOVIE QUOTES of ALL TIME?

IN 2005, the American Film Institute announced the 100 most memorable movie quotes of all time.

The jury was composed of 1,500 film artists, critics, and historians.

Part of the AFI 100 Years... series, AFI's 100 Years... 100 Movie Quotes is a list of the top 100 movie quotations in American cinema. The American Film Institute revealed the list in June of 2005 in a three-hour television program on CBS. The program was hosted by actor Pierce Brosnan and had commentary from many Hollywood actors and filmmakers.
--AFI's 100 Years...100 Movie Quotes


How many of the following quotes is the reader familiar with? There are three characters in the Top 25 that have two quotes each. Before peeking, are there any guesses who these might be?
HINT: One is an actor (who has a total of three quotes in the Top 25) and two are actresses.

Link at the end will take you to the rest of the Top 100.

Enjoy!






















"A census taker once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice Chianti."



No.QuotationCharacter ActorMOVIE
1"Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn."Rhett ButlerClark GableGone With the Wind
2"I'm gonna make him an offer he can't refuse."Vito CorleoneMarlon BrandonThe Godfather
3 "You don't understand! I coulda had class. I coulda been a contender. I could've been somebody, instead of a bum, which is what I am."Terry MaloneMarlon BrandoOn the Waterfront
4"Toto, I've got a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore."Dorothy GaleJudy GarlandThe Wizard of Oz
5"Here's looking at you, kid."Rick BlaineHumphrey BogartCasablanca
6"Go ahead, make my day."Harry CallahanClint EastwoodSudden Impact
7"All right, Mr. DeMille, I'm ready for my close-up."Norma DesmondGloria SwansonSunset Boulevard
8"May the Force be with you."Obi Wan KenobiAlec GuinnessStar Wars Episode IV: A New Hope
9"Fasten your seatbelts. It's going to be a bumpy night."Margo ChanningBette DavisAll About Eve
10"You talkin' to me?"Travis BickleRobert DiNiroTaxi Driver
11"What we've got here is failure to communicate."CaptainStrother MartinCool Hand Luke
12"I love the smell of napalm in the morning!"Lt. Col. Bill KilgoreRobert DuvallApocolypse Now
13"Love means never having to say you're sorry."Jennifer Cavilleri BarrettAli McGrawLove Story
14"The stuff that dreams are made of."Sam SpadeHumprey BogartThe Maltese Falcon
15"E.T. phone home."E.T.Pat WelshE.T. the Extra-Terrestrial
16"They call me Mister Tibbs!"Virgil TibbsSidney PoitierIn the Heat of the Night
17"Rosebud."Charles Foster KaneOrsen WellesCitizen Kane
18"Made it, Ma! Top of the world!"Arthur "Cody" JarrettJames CagneyWhite Heat
19"I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this anymore!"Howard BealePeter FinchNetwork
20"Louis, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship."Rick BlaineHumphrey BogartCasablanca
21Hannibal LectorAnthony HopkinsThe Silence of the Lambs
22"Bond. James Bond."James BondSean ConneryDr. No
23"There's no place like home."Dorothy HaleJudy GarlandThe Wizard of Oz
24"I am big! It's the pictures that got small."Norma DesmondGloria SwansonSunset Boulevard
25"Show me the money!"Rod TidwellCuba Gooding, Jr.Jerry Malone


How many of these had the reader heard before? On a personal note, #24 was new to this writer.

For the rest of the Top 100 quotes: AFI's 100 Years…100 Movie Quotes.




by Mondo Frazier
images:
* Nighthawk News
* Swiss Miss







Monday, October 12, 2009

DBKP.com Hacked!



Your Ad Here






Our main site, DBKP.com (http://deathby1000papercuts.com), was hacked and is in the midst of restoring itself. We're hoping that it goes back up in the next 24 hours. It went off-line Saturday (October 10 2009) evening. We're working with the server folks to restore the site and get back on-line.

Until then, we'll be publishing here at DBKP@Blogger.

Patience.

Dan Rather sends his regards: "Courage".

Thanks, Dan.

UPDATE: It's more accurate to say we fell prey to a malicious worm.

And no, we're not talking about the ex-brother-in-law.



by Mondo
image: http://mimttm.files.wordpress.com







Sunday, October 4, 2009

MORNING BRIEF: Michael Moore and Ramming Obama Care Through



Your Ad Here


dbkp inside

MORNING INTELL
Monday-October 5, 2009


* UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES Unexpected Outgrowths of the Tea Party Movement.
Backlash against the Left's best God-eradication efforts?
Bonus: The author self-describes: "Lloyd Marcus, Black Unhyphenated American!"


* HOW CAN THIS BE? AP: Middle class might not afford Obamacare. Does President Obama know about this? Who's responsible for not informing him? Will heads roll?


* WHO WOULD HAVE GUESSED? Michael Moore’s Movie “Capitalism” Tanks at Box Office … Blame it on Capitalism:

"As Big Government points out, a movie that crashes capitalism in a capitalist country fails, go figure. More from Steve Mason."

The guess from this corner is: the movie-goers who attended were sympathetic to Moore's political viewpoint; i.e., university liberals, Hollywood types, denizens of big-city newspapers and newsroom people from the Big 4 Shrinking news networks (CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN).

Or not. Factor in at least a few "bored-teens-on-Saturday-searching-for-something-to-watch-that-they-hadn't-seen-on-Friday-night".

Maybe there's not as many of those people as I thought. Still, Powerline [Zombies 1 Socialists 0] points out: "For purposes of comparison, Zombieland raked in nearly $10 million. Still, even unsuccessful propaganda can do damage. It's a safe bet that hardly any of those who went to see Zombieland actually believe in zombies, while a considerable number of those who saw Moore's film may actually believe in socialism."



OBAMALYMPICS, IRANIAN NEGOTIATING POINTS, NFL Relocating 2 teams?, and more...
Read the rest at DBKP Morning Intell: October 5 2009


by Mondo Frazier




 
coompax-digital magazine